Showing posts with label Vesicoureteral Reflux. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Vesicoureteral Reflux. Show all posts

Monday, December 23, 2013

Vesicoureteric reflux in children.

Kari JA, El-Desoky SM, Basnawi F, Bahrawi O. (2013) Vesicoureteric reflux in children. Urology Annals. 2013 Oct;5(4):232-6.
 

AIM:

This study aimed to identify the differences between primary and secondary vesicoureteric reflux (VUR) and the effect of associated bladder abnormalities on kidney function.

PATIENTS AND METHODS:

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of children with VUR who were followed up at King Abdulaziz University Hospital from January 2005 to December 2010. The review included results of radiological investigations and kidney function tests. We used Chi-square test for statistical analysis and paired t-test to compare group means for initial and last creatinine levels.

RESULTS:

Ninety-nine children were included in this study. Twenty (20.2%) had primary VUR, 11 had high-grade VUR, while 9 had low-grade reflux. All children with low-grade VUR had normal dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA). Renal scars were present in 72% of the children with high-grade VUR. The mean creatinine levels (initial and last) for both groups were normal. Seventy-nine (79.8%) children had secondary VUR, which was due to posterior urethral valves (PUV) (46.8%), neurogenic bladder caused by meningomyelocele (25.3%), non-neurogenic neurogenic bladder (NNB) (21.5%), or neurogenic bladder associated with prune belly syndrome (6.3%). Children with NNB, meningomyelocele and PUV had high creatinine at presentation with no considerable worsening of their kidney functions during the last visit. Renal scars were present in 49.4% of the children with secondary VUR.

CONCLUSION:

Children with primary VUR and normal bladder had good-functioning kidneys, while those with secondary VUR associated with abnormal bladder caused by NNB, spina bifida or PUV had abnormal kidney functions. DMSA scans were useful in predicting higher grades of VUR in children with primary reflux.

KEYWORDS:

Children, neurogenic bladder, posterior urethral valves, primary reflux, secondary reflux, vesicoureteric reflux
 
doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.120292.
 

Monday, October 1, 2007

Factors affecting renal scar development in children with spina bifida

Ozel SK, Dokumcu Z, Akyildiz C, Avanoglu A, Ulman I. Factors affecting renal scar development in children with spina bifida. Urologia Internationalis. 2007;79(2):133-6.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Prevention of renal scarring is the main therapeutic goal in children with spina bifida. We aimed to determine factors affecting renal scar development in these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Records of 312 children admitted between 1994 and 2005 with spina bifida were reviewed. Age on admission, gender, presence of previous febrile urinary tract infections (UTIs), vesicoureteral reflux (VUR), and initial urodynamic findings were noted. Patients were grouped regarding presence/absence of renal scars on DMSA scans. Chi2 and Student's t tests were used for statistical evaluation.

RESULTS: Seventy-two patients had renal scars on admission. Mean age was 4.62 +/- 4.59 years for patients without renal scars and 6.35 +/- 4.9 years for patients with scars. Male/female ratio was 1:1 in the scarless group and 1:2 in the group with scars. Previous febrile UTI was present in 11 of 240 scarless patients in contrast to 7 out of 72 patients in the scar group (p > 0.05). VUR was present in only 16.3% of cases without scars, whereas 36.1% of patients in the scar group had VUR. Detrusor overactivity and detrusor sphincter dyssynergia were observed in 67.1% of scarred patients, whereas this figure was 42.4% in the scarless group. The comparison of age on admission, gender, detrusor overactivity, and detrusor sphincter dyssynergia revealed significant differences between patients with and without renal scars.

CONCLUSIONS: Late referral, female gender, overactive detrusor, and detrusor sphincter dyssynergia have detrimental effects on renal parenchymal function in spina bifida patients. Patient selection for aggressive treatment using these features may prevent renal parenchymal deterioration. 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel

PMID: 17851282