Showing posts with label Bladder Augmentation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bladder Augmentation. Show all posts

Monday, December 23, 2013

Tumor in bladder reservoir after gastrocystoplasty.

Castellan M, Gosalbez R, Perez-Brayfield M, Healey P, McDonald R, Labbie A, Lendvay T. (2007)
Tumor in bladder reservoir after gastrocystoplasty. Journal of Urology. 2007 Oct;178(4 Pt 2):1771-4; discussion 1774.


PURPOSE:

To our knowledge the risk of malignancy in patients with previous bladder augmentation with stomach is unknown. We report 3 cases of gastric adenocarcinoma and 1 of transitional cell carcinoma after augmentation cystoplasty with stomach with long-term followup.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Between August 1989 and August 2002, 119 patients underwent augmentation cystoplasty with stomach at our 2 institutions (University of Miami School of Medicine, and Seattle Children's Hospital and Regional Medical Center). Medical records, urodynamic studies, radiographic imaging and laboratory evaluations were reviewed retrospectively and cases of malignancy were analyzed in detail.

RESULTS:

Four male patients had carcinoma after augmentation gastrocystoplasty. Preoperative diagnosis was neurogenic bladder in 3 patients and posterior urethral valve in 1. Three patients had gastric adenocarcinoma, while the other had poorly differentiated transitional cell carcinoma. Each case progressed to malignancy more than 10 years after augmentation (11, 12, 14 and 14 years, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients who undergo bladder augmentation with a gastric remnant are at increased risk for malignancy, probably similar to that in patients with enterocystoplasty. Therefore, they require close long-term followup. Patients should be followed annually with ultrasound, and cystoscopy should be performed annually starting 10 years after gastrocystoplasty unless they have abnormal ultrasound, hematuria or another cancer risk factor. Any suspicious lesions should be biopsied, especially at the gastrovesical anastomotic site.

doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.100



Transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder following augmentation cystoplasty for the neuropathic bladder.


Soergel TM, Cain MP, Misseri R, Gardner TA, Koch MO, Rink RC. (2004) Transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder following augmentation cystoplasty for the neuropathic bladder.
Journal of Urology. 2004 Oct;172(4 Pt 2):1649-51; discussion 1651-2.

PURPOSE:

Patients with neurogenic bladder dysfunction due to spina bifida have been reported to be at increased risk for bladder cancer. Recent publications suggest that bladder augmentation is also a significant risk factor. We reviewed our experience with treating patients with spina bifida and bladder cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Patients with spina bifida treated for bladder cancer between 1995 and 2005 were identified. Patient demographics, mode of bladder management, risk factors and presenting symptoms were recorded along with therapy, pathological findings and outcome. This patient cohort was combined with all prior known published studies for analysis.

RESULTS:

Eight patients with a median age of 41 years were treated. Only 1 patient (13%) had undergone bladder augmentation. Locally advanced stage (T3 or greater) or lymph node metastases were present in 88% of cases. Median survival was 6 months with only 1 patient alive with no evidence of recurrence at 20 months. A total of 11 prior published cases were identified and combined with this series. Transitional cell carcinoma was present in 58% of patients. Median survival was 6 months. Only 37% of patients had undergone bladder augmentation.

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients with spina bifida and bladder cancer present at a young age with variable tumor histology and advanced stage, and they have poor survival. Presenting symptoms are often atypical and bladder cancer should be a consideration in this patient population, even in young adults. Due to poor survival further study is warranted in this population to determine whether screening would be beneficial for earlier detection and improved outcomes.

doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000140194.87974.56

Monday, November 10, 2008

Evaluating Outcomes of Enterocystoplasty in Patients With Spina Bifida: A Review of the Literature

Scales CD Jr, Wiener JS. Evaluating Outcomes of Enterocystoplasty in Patients With Spina Bifida: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Urology. 2008 Oct 16.

Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

PURPOSE: The urological complications of spina bifida impose a significant burden of disability and disease. Therapy is focused on the bladder to achieve the primary goals of maintaining normal renal function and attaining urinary continence. When medical management fails, surgical intervention, including enterocystoplasty, is frequently performed. However, practice patterns for enterocystoplasty show significant variation. Given this context, we examined outcome measures for enterocystoplasty in patients with spina bifida.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A MEDLINE(R) search was performed for articles on enterocystoplasty in patients with spina bifida. A total of 226 articles were identified and manually reviewed for relevant studies. Additional articles were selected based on a cited reference search. RESULTS: Almost all studies are retrospective, single institution case series of a relatively small number of patients. Few uniform or validated outcome measures for enterocystoplasty exist but reported measures typically include urodynamic, continence and satisfaction parameters. Interinstitutional variability in urodynamic measurements and in definitions of continence makes a comparison of outcomes difficult. The complication rate following enterocystoplasty is significant, well described and primarily related to the use of gastrointestinal segments for urine storage.

CONCLUSIONS: Medical management is the mainstay of neurogenic bladder therapy in the spina bifida population. Enterocystoplasty remains an important option to prevent or reverse upper tract deterioration, and/or improve or cure socially unacceptable incontinence despite poorly defined outcome measures. The development of appropriate and validated outcomes measures may enable more uniform, effective and safe urological care of patients with spina bifida.

PMID: 18930285

Sunday, April 27, 2008

Treatment of the neurogenic bladder in spina bifida.

de Jong TP, Chrzan R, Klijn AJ, Dik P. Treatment of the neurogenic bladder in spina bifida. Pediatric Nephrology. 2008 Mar 19;

Pediatric Renal Center, Department of Pediatric Urology, University Children’s Hospital, UMCU, P.O. Box 85090, 3508 AB, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Renal damage and renal failure are among the most severe complications of spina bifida. Over the past decades, a comprehensive treatment strategy has been applied that results in minimal renal scaring. In addition, the majority of patients can be dry for urine by the time they go to primary school. To obtain such results, it is mandatory to treat detrusor overactivity from birth onward, as upper urinary tract changes predominantly start in the first months of life. This means that new patients with spina bifida should be treated from birth by clean intermittent catheterization and pharmacological suppression of detrusor overactivity. Urinary tract infections, when present, need aggressive treatment, and in many patients, permanent prophylaxis is indicated. Later in life, therapy can be tailored to urodynamic findings. Children with paralyzed pelvic floor and hence urinary incontinence are routinely offered surgery around the age of 5 years to become dry. Rectus abdominis sling suspension of the bladder neck is the first-choice procedure, with good to excellent results in both male and female patients. In children with detrusor hyperactivity, detrusorectomy can be performed as an alternative for ileocystoplasty provided there is adequate bladder capacity. Wheelchair-bound patients can manage their bladder more easily with a continent catheterizable stoma on top of the bladder. This stoma provides them extra privacy and diminishes parental burden. Bowel management is done by retrograde or antegrade enema therapy. Concerning sexuality, special attention is needed to address expectations of adolescent patients. Sensibility of the glans penis can be restored by surgery in the majority of patients.

PMID: 18350321